| Home
SIM card allegations against Haneef could be untrue: Counsel
Barbados News.Net Friday 20th July, 2007 (ANI)
Brisbane, July 20 : The defence counsel of Dr. Mohammed Haneef, the Indian born doctor detained in Brisbane for his suspected role in the June 29 and 30 foiled terror attacks in the UK, believes that the allegation of Haneef passing on his SIM card to his two cousins in Britain, could be untrue.
However, he says that he is still unsure about his premise.
According to a news.com.au report, the SIM card, which Haneef had allegedly given to his cousin Sabeel Ahmed, one of the key accused in the failed bomb plot, was found in his possession in Liverpool, and not in the jeep used to attack the Glasgow Airport, as previously claimed.
Meanwhile, ABC Radio quoted unnamed sources as saying that Haneef's SIM card was actually seized by Glasgow Police eight hours after the airport attack when Ahmed was arrested in Liverpool.
Earlier this week, a Brisbane court was told by the prosecution counsel that the SIM card belonging to Haneef, a Gold Coast-based doctor, was found in the jeep that crashed into the exterior wing of the Glasgow Airport .
"It is one piece in a fairly complex matter. So whether or not it is the ace in the pack, we don't know at this stage," Haneef's counsel Peter Russo said after reading the report.
Haneef has been charged for 'recklessly' giving away his SIM card to his cousin last year before heading for Queensland. Though Haneef got bail in the case, he was soon taken into custody by the Australian immigration officials for failing the 'character test'.
Russo, who would be meeting Haneef at the Wolston Correctional Centre here today said: "It is one of the many things that I was trying to piece together," adding that charges against his client will be proved incorrect only at the open court rather than pointing finger at someone.
Refusing to term the Australian Federal Police (AFP) enquiry as 'sloppy', he said, "I'm not trying to make excuses for them (AFP) and I know any information that is put before the court has to be accurate."
Haneef, 27, has been in custody since July 2, but was only charged on July 14, which led to global criticism of his 12-day detention without charge. Email this story to a friend
Comments on this story
Michael Kerjman 07-20-07, 04:42 AM |
SIM card allegations against Haneef could be untrue: Counsel
So, should foreign travelers using perks for visitors -EU telecommunication offers a local Euro SIM card surely is- automatically be charged with plotting the terror if this card passed to a different person?
I must confess, having my photo torn off a Card Orange I placed a still valid ticket ON instead INTO rubbish bin at Charles de Goulle International years ago in Paris.
And I commit a very similar deed in any place I leave, where friends of mine have been to especially.
It is clear, an air traveler and responsible Western citizen is undisputedly naturally supportive to services and actions making the globe free from terrorism and terrorists.
|
Anonymous 08-04-07, 12:47 AM |
Australian Professionals
Good on ya mate,
Why should Australian investigators be much more professional than engineers, doctors and other employment-privileged holders of uni degrees-locally-provided?
Non-Muslim Respondent
|
Anonymous 08-06-07, 09:32 AM |
Michael Kerjman;35947: So, should foreign travelers using perks for visitors -EU telecommunication offers a local Euro SIM card surely is- automatically be charged with plotting the terror if this card passed to a different person? ....
And more - what “Australian mateship” means with no material support?
Think of it.
Non-Muslim Respondent
|
Following a topic 11-02-07, 11:46 PM |
Recently, investigating the investigators is blossoming.
Democracy bits sometimes-prior to the oncoming Australian federal election definitely.
|
Noah 11-15-07, 10:06 PM |
Playing justice
HOT NEWS: the Australian High Court has just ordered re-instatement of Haniff’s visa – the Government of Australia has appealed against this order.
|
R.K.J-n 12-07-07, 10:23 PM |
A practical motion?
December 06, 2007
“PRIME Minister Kevin Rudd says the Government is seeking advice on how to conduct an official investigation into the handling of former terrorism suspect Dr Mohamed Haneef.
Mr Rudd said Labor would make good on its pre-election commitment to establish a judicial inquiry into the case but did not yet know when one would be started.
He denied the Government was “raking over the coals” and said the inquiry was necessary to ensure anti-terrorism legislation was kept accountable. […]”
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,,22881140-2702,00.html
If even some Australian-permanently-based UK-originated investigation team member could become a scape-goal responsible for accusing an Australian resident in terrorism on grounds of providing while overseas his SIM card to UK-based terror-plotters a YEAR PRIOR to a terror-act, a question remains what a sort of unique clerical skills do Indian-graduated doctors bring about to reception desks of Australian state capitals’ hospitals as, one knows, locally recognised professionals - Australian citizens steadily, intentionally, upon generations denied employment (professional surely) for being non-Anglo-Celts/non-Christians?
|
Anonymous 12-20-07, 08:44 PM |
Court backs Haneef's return to Australia
Friday December 21, 12:10 PM
Court backs Haneef’s return to Australia
A court ruling has cleared the way for former terror suspect Mohamed Haneef to return to Australia.
The full bench of the Federal Court, sitting in Melbourne, dismissed an appeal lodged by federal government lawyers against a judge’s decision to reinstate Dr Haneef’s visa. [...]
http://au.news.yahoo.com/070722/2/140yr.html
Will it help “M. Kerjman” and millions of other professionals discriminated, oppressed and humiliated on biological basis in Australia for not being Anglo-Celts/Saxons to improve their status in Australia?
|
Johnny Smith 04-16-08, 06:20 AM |
"Michael Kerjman" was right once again.
According to POLICE “IGNORED” CRUCIAL HANEEF EMAIL by D.Marr,
http://www.theage.com.au/news/national/police-ignored-crucial-haneef-email/2008/04/13/1208024996168.html ,
the “police won’t discuss the Old Bailey revelations. Now they face two hard questions that go to their competence and good faith: “When did you read the jihad confession email?" And “Why did you ignore it?"
“Michael Kerjman” was right once again.
And who will investigate Anglo-xenophobic, traditionally racist Australian approach while rejecting even the most talented and skilled non-Anglo-Saxons from employment in Australia?
|
Human Rights Watch 09-03-08, 11:46 PM |
Speaking Arabic perfectly?
So, a micro-regime-change in Australia resulted in announcements that Haneeff is “a person out of a police interest”, an Indian Muslim is seeking compensation while working as a doctor in Dubai, the UAE.
Perhaps, his Arabic is good to be employed there, and what about already established a non-Muslim international professional Kerjman rejected in Australia as a none-Anglo-Sax specialist?
|
Healthy writer 09-06-08, 12:14 AM |
An Australian experience is the most
Human Rights Watch;100841:
Perhaps, his Arabic is good to be employed there...
His Australian experience in playing English, as a registrar at a hospital desk, is the most, stupid.
|
make sex-not lies 12-26-08, 11:34 PM |
HOWARD ERA NEXT LIE EXPOSED
A neo-racist lie exposed at last:
http://www.theage.com.au/national/no-evidence-he-was-associated-with-the-terrorist-events-20081223-74cd.html?page=-1
'No evidence he was associated with the terrorist events': Special Investigation
|
M.Kerjman 06-23-09, 09:55 PM |
The End of the Story?
Haneef lesson learnt as rules quietly reformed (The Age, 22 June 2009)
http://www.theage.com.au/national/haneef-lesson-le arnt-as-rules-quietly-ref ormed-20090622-ctzj.html
To read an original article, please, copy & past 2-line URL manually.
|
Michael Kerjman 07-01-10, 08:42 PM |
Australian justice: life continues
UPDATE:
Mohamed Haneef, the Indian doctor arrested after the London and Glasgow terror attacks three years ago, is suing former immigration minister Kevin Andrews for defamation and wrongful detention.
Lawyers for wrongly accused terrorism suspect Dr Mohamed Haneef say they are in talks with the federal government, and court action may not be pursued.
|
Have your say on this story
|
|